My first attempt was a disaster with non-implants, but you know that it doesn't even look like a nose job, and if you use non-implants, you end up with a nose bridge, right? But if you look at the reviews of non-implant noses, most of them have sharp lines starting from the bridge of their noses, but those are all brokers haha. Also, when a plastic surgery clinic takes a photo of a non-implant model, they edit the nose and upload it? Honestly, I think silicone contracture is something you just have to deal with if you decide to have surgery (if you're afraid of inflammation and contracture, you shouldn't touch plastic surgery. Especially for the nose, the disease starts from the moment you touch it), and there is no implant that fits as well as silicone not only on the nose but also on the human body. I think it's right to just put silicone on the bridge of the nose, even if it's just 1mm. Non-implants should be considered as almost always having a step, and only people with naturally pretty noses who have a bit of a bridge should get them. ㅇㅇ
Only people who want to improve their nose bridge a little without getting any plastic surgery in a really natural way should get non-implants. But if that's the case, is there a need to endure columella scars, risk of nasal dysfunction, removal of my cartilage, lifelong inflammation management, foreign body sensation, etc.?
The number one reason for nose revision surgery is not inflammatory contracture but dissatisfaction with the appearance. This is what I felt after failing with implant-free surgery.
무보형물은 기존 콧대가 좀 높은 사람이 해야함 이 수술법 자체가 콧등융기가 심한 서양인한테 맞춰서 나온 거라...ㅜ 대부분의 동양인들은 이거 하면 그냥 있던 콧대도 깎여나가는 거야..... 글쓴예사 말대로 콤플렉스 교정이 아니라 미적 용도로 수술할거면 보형물 까는 게 맞아
매부리는 무보랑 실리콘중에 잘선택해야함. 실리콘 넣으면 매부리 겁나깎고 넣어서 나중에 만에하나 실리 염증생기면 대략난감임. 내 지인 무보로 했는데 원래 매부리 있었어서 그런지 자연스럽고 오똑하게 잘됨. 오랜만에 만나서 그냥 얘 코가 되게 이뻤네 이생각만하고 코수술했다고 생각도못함.