1) In the case of an incision in the aponeurosis (aponeurosis advancement surgery)
- The aponeurosis is shortened and when attached to the eyelid plate, the eyelid plate is pulled, resulting in rabbit eyes
- The shortened material is forcibly attached, causing vomiting, sleeping with the eyes open, and dry eyes.
2) In the case of an incisional bridge where the Müller muscle is incised
- Since the Müller muscle is connected to the autonomic nervous system, headaches, tension, and various side effects occur.
3) In the case of tying the aponeurosis and the Müller muscle with thread through a non-incision (non-incision bridge)
- There are several points on the fine muscles. Since it is something you pick up, the side effects are severe. When there is a problem due to adhesion with the thread, the damage to the aponeurosis and Müller muscle is significant..
-
https://m.blog.naver.com/PostView.naver?isHttpsRedirect=true&blogId=ozclinickang&logNo=220969713929 Reference to the non-incision eye bridge
- The non-incision eye bridge is It was created in Japan in January 2010 (Yusuke Shimizu paper) and has since spread indiscriminately in Korea.
- However, since it involves sewing on the most sensitive muscle called the Müller muscle, it is a surgical method that causes minor swelling according to common sense. That Japanese guy named Shimizu looks young.
If there are any side effects, you can just solve it again, right?
You may think this way, but since
it usually involves cutting a muscle, the surgery itself becomes extremely difficult when a short muscle is attached to the eyelid plate during the loosening process.
This is because the cost of eye bridge revision surgery is high, and even if you undergo revision surgery, there is a high possibility that you will be ripped off by scammers who will only repeat surgery (a fundamental solution).
Even though I had the surgery again, there were still side effects, so I had to have it again, and there were side effects, and then the skin spare muscles were short, so the side effect cafe was back and forth... It was dark.
Even if I had ptosis,
I think I would hold off on the current surgery method.
It is not a surgery whose safety has yet been properly guaranteed, and it is a surgical method that is in the testing stage.
It was only in 2014 that Soonchunhyang University Ophthalmology Professor Seonyoung Jang's team published a paper on the Mueller eradication eye surgery method.
https://news.mt.co.kr/mtview.php?no=2014070113421929562 It's a surgery that requires verification only 7 years ago, so you're going to do this..?
If there is no major functional problem, just wait
until a more proven surgical method is developed.
Moreover, as you can see from that article, Jang Seon-young's team reported that more than 10 out of 60 people showed over-correction/under-correction.
Even though it was done at a university hospital, you would go to a plastic surgeon to have this type of surgery?
They say that out of 60 people who come to the hospital for eyelid surgery like you, 10 out of 60 people may experience side effects.
님
묘이
