Review of revision eye surgery in Seomyeon, Busan

<부산 서면 발품>

<Busan Seomyeon Balpum><Busan Revision Eye Surgery Review>
 
In the past, going to consultations was fun, but
 now I'm so tired and can't make decisions. Lack of stamina + indecisiveness.
 After attending Yeoya Cafe and Seongyeosa, I went to 7 consultations over two days.
 
Order of going I'll leave it as is,
 
number 1.
 Recommendation of minimal incision revision surgery on only one side. 880,000 This
 was my first time going to this place, and the director was so pretty and kind that I was impressed haha.
 The director was kind, but in hindsight, there was nothing that really impressed me.
 The reason I recommend minimal incision surgery on only one side is to make incisions on both sides to get rid of breast fat. + I have to re-enter the eye bridge, but honestly, I don't recommend re-entering both to get rid of one.
 2-year free after-sales service,
 swelling injections, etc. services are available for free
 . Overall, clean and bright atmosphere
 

No. 2.
 Recommendation of complete incision revision surgery on both sides, 1.2 million cash.
 Director's opinion. Not only is Tina pursuing something that is clear and natural, but Tina is also pursuing something pretty. She
 never once asked me why I came, and as soon as I sat down,
 the lines on both sides were small, so both incisions + larger lines + in-out or out. I want to hold it for
 2 years as
 a whole, and the neighborhood has a big internal medicine atmosphere
 

3 times.
 Reoperation with complete incision on both sides: 1.98 million, complete incision on one side: 1.21 million.
 To remove sternum and improve the obstructed front oblique line, an incision is recommended on both sides, or an incision on only the right side, which is most in need of improvement.
 The director and director will immediately catch what you want to improve without any special mention.
 My sister was pretty and had a refreshing personality, and
 the director was also kind, but I remember the director a lot,
 so it was the only place I went for a second consultation. What is questionable is that the director first told me to improve the blockage in the diagonal line in the front, but when I went for a second consultation, You said that even if you make an incision, the blocked diagonal line in the front won't be greatly improved...
 Can we interpret this as saying that it will improve, but there won't be a big change? ㅋ Qㅠㅠ
 4 times the overall clean and bright atmosphere with the 2-year free service
 

. There is nothing to recommend. Just avoid raising the line too high.
 I think it would be good to improve the blocked area in the front while revealing the double eyelid line in the front, but then the line in the back will also become thicker. But the thick line doesn't suit my eyes,
 so I don't think I can tell you exactly what to do.
 That's why I had a mental breakdown. ...
 Nevertheless, if you really wanted it, they told you to choose the surgery method you want and hear the price,
 but I asked roughly as a formality and left.
 The director thought about it with me and listened carefully,
 but the director seemed to be a beginner, so she kept looking around and I couldn't hear what she was saying, so
 she kept repeating unimportant things.
 

5 th.
 Natural adhesion was recommended for only one side.
 After trying it a few times, he recommended natural adhesion.
 I told him that I had talked about incisions in several other places because of the scarring, and he said that he would have to do it again when he got older anyway, but that it was recommended not to open the eye bags.
 6 times the swelling package was provided for 2 years.
 

. Recommendation of complete incision on both sides 1.8 million.
 The recommended method of cutting a little more flesh on the front and fixing the line while removing breast fat
 was a solution to all the concerns, but
 after consulting with the manager, I did not want to do it here.
 It seemed like he was mistaking unkindness for firmness.
 

Number 7.
 Natural adhesion was recommended for both 1.2 million people.
 He told me not to make many incisions at a young age (but I felt it only later, but the director seemed to have mistaken me for being younger).
 He also said that the eyes could be fixed with natural adhesion alone because the skin was not thick. He
 also made incisions and the eyes are now good. They said they were concerned that the image would disappear. It
 was 2 years ago, but they said it was impossible due to shape change and that only loosening was possible.
 
8 years ago, I had a complete incision double eye surgery - 7 years ago, I had a complete incision revision surgery + eye correction + epicanthoplasty.